Monday, February 28, 2011
Infamous UK Cleric Plans Thursday Sharia Rally in D.C.: ‘Rise to Implement the Shari’ah in America’
I can just imagine the Liberals and Progressives falling over themselves to join this march (wonder if there'll be any gay men and women also stamping their feet and clapping theirs hands for Shariah?). Not only is there going to be a march this Thursday for a "new" U.S. constitution based on Sharia law, but on the Forth of July there's going to be a MMM in DC (before you get any ideas, it stands for “Million Muslim March”) so that you too can heal after 9/11. I get goose bumps all over just thinking of all this Muslim love. How can America refuse? I've been a lone voice in the dessert regarding America's foreign policy. If I offend anyone by airing my views then tough - but my view is that America has poked her nose in other people's business for far too long - sending troops all over the place, acting like the international police force . How many soldiers have been killed fighting other people's battles?? If they had just kept to themselves instead of meddling, and let everyone sort their own business out then these Muslims wouldn't feel the need to ruin the country. America should have sealed her borders and looked after her own people - and implemented a much stricter immigration policy. Instead, every third-worlder and Hispanic with a sob story gets a place ahead of the Europeans and the country is going down the tubes faster than the Titanic sank. Now every guy named Mohammed wants a piece of that democracy that has weakened America. And Mohammed is going to use that democracy to ruin the country. That's just my view...
This coming Fourth of July, Muslims are planning a “Million Muslim March” in D.C. to “re-establish the feelings of brother and sisterhood among Muslim Americans“ and start the ”healing” process after 9/11. And while there is no indication that rally will dabble in Sharia law, a different D.C. march scheduled for Thursday boldly declares its goal of bringing Sharia law “directly to the doorsteps of the United States of America.”
The rally is being spearheaded by radical UK Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary, who recently told Sean Hannity Americans are “the biggest criminals in the world today,“ and in October announced ”the flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House.” His group, Islam4UK, has been outlawed in Britain.
“We hereby call upon the Muslims in the US, particularly in New York, Michigan, Chicago and Washington DC to take lessons from their Muslim brothers and sisters in North Africa and the Middle East and rise to implement the Shari’ah in America,” the group Shariah4America, seemingly modeled after Choudary’s UK organization, says on its website.
It goes on to advocate for a new U.S. constitution based on Sharia law:
This coming Fourth of July, Muslims are planning a “Million Muslim March” in D.C. to “re-establish the feelings of brother and sisterhood among Muslim Americans“ and start the ”healing” process after 9/11. And while there is no indication that rally will dabble in Sharia law, a different D.C. march scheduled for Thursday boldly declares its goal of bringing Sharia law “directly to the doorsteps of the United States of America.”
The rally is being spearheaded by radical UK Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary, who recently told Sean Hannity Americans are “the biggest criminals in the world today,“ and in October announced ”the flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House.” His group, Islam4UK, has been outlawed in Britain.
“We hereby call upon the Muslims in the US, particularly in New York, Michigan, Chicago and Washington DC to take lessons from their Muslim brothers and sisters in North Africa and the Middle East and rise to implement the Shari’ah in America,” the group Shariah4America, seemingly modeled after Choudary’s UK organization, says on its website.
It goes on to advocate for a new U.S. constitution based on Sharia law:
On 3rd March 2011 From 1pm to 4pm (local time), at Pennsylvania Avenue, outside the White House, the Muslims will let the tyrant Barack Obama and the American people know that a new constitution beckons the US called the Shari’ah, and that this worldwide revolution will see it implemented inshaa’allah (God willing) very very soon.Read more here
Australia: ONE OR TWO QUESTIONS
A great come back from Tim Blair on his blog at the daily telegraph. In case you've missed the brilliant announcement, the Australian shrew PM will be introducing a carbon tax from 1 July 2012; this after she went to last year's election saying that there would be no carbon tax under the government she leads. But, she came to her political senses and decided that it was more important to ruin Australia than to lose the Green vote to keep her in power. Australians are NOT HAPPY. This Carbon tax is going to be a tax on everything - except "agriculture" which produces a quarter of our "emissions". Andrew Bolt (another very popular conservative blogger in Australia) posted that a carbon tax would bring in $11 billion alone just by taxing the top 300 Australian companies in the first year! Can you imagine how competitive Australia will be by the end of this exercise? But, not to worry - Julia is going to give some all of the money back in the form of subsidies to the most vulnerable because apparently only poor people and people on the dole don't emit carbon. Of course, the UN will get a nice stiff piece of the financial pie to "support" developing nations. Steal from Peter to give to Paul and Sipho. In any case, Tim has put a few very pertinent questions together for our esteemed and moral PM - not that she'll bother answering them. She'd rather we look the other way whilst she stabs us in the back as she did to Kevin Rudd...
Dear Prime Minister Gillard,
Thank you for making the weather nicer by forcing us to pay more for everything. Who knew that fixing the global climate was so simple? Still, one or two questions remain about your new plan and a few related matters.
Yours in climate justice,
Tim
• By how much will your carbon dioxide tax reduce Australia’s temperature?
• If after five years there has been no recorded decline in temperature, will the tax be abandoned?
• Multiple choice! How much money has already been wasted by federal Australian governments on pointless climate change initiatives that have done nothing:
a - $2,000,000,000
b - $3,500,000,000
c - $5,500,000,000
• If taxing Australians at a certain level will make us more competitive with the rest of the world, as you claim, then surely taxing us at even higher levels will make us more competitive still. Universal taxation at, say, 80 per cent should make us a global powerhouse. Why are you holding Australia back?
• You claim that Australians want this new tax. How about testing your theory at an election?
• If I announced on television that I was going to kidnap the federal cabinet and put them through a series of deadly Saw-style torture tests, do you think I could avoid charges by asking the police to stop going on about “semantics” and “word games”?
• Do you have any experience in herding cats? This might be important during your coming 16 months of negotiations with the Greens, who you seem to have forgotten are completely insane.
• Considering Labor couldn’t run a simple grocery pricing website and Labor’s attempts to insulate houses ended up setting them on fire and killing people, what are the odds Labor can successfully run the country’s largest and most complicated tax regime?
• Labor promised to reduce the number of boat people arrivals. As with everything else, Labor’s policies resulted in exactly the opposite outcome. Now you’re trying to change the weather. Where should people hide?
• Carbon dioxide contains two oxygen atoms for every one carbon atom. Shouldn’t we call it an “oxygen tax”?
• If the aim of the carbon tax is to change behaviour, why are you planning to compensate so many households? They’ll just keep killing the planet and get no penalties at all.
• At what point does carbon dioxide’s necessary presence in the atmosphere become “pollution”?
• If the carbon tax is definitely going to be introduced on July 1, 2012, how come Tim Flannery is going to be paid $720,000 over the next four whole years while he roams the country “explaining” it?
• Isn’t explaining new taxes your job? Or, more specifically, Wayne Swan’s?
• For that matter, where was Wayne the other day when you announced this massive new tax? You were there, and so was Bob Brown and Christine Milne and Greg Combet and Tony Windsor and the Hairy Princess. But no Wayne.
• The next time you see Wayne, could you ask him why he said this last August: “What we rejected is this hysterical allegation that somehow we are moving towards a carbon tax.” This question should really be asked by journalists, I guess, but they’re too busy making excuses for your hilarious lies.
• What is the point of building a $27 billion national broadband network to deliver computer connectivity across the nation when Greg Combet is telling people to turn off lights and televisions?
• Another thing: how much more cost will be added to the NBN courtesy of the carbon tax?
• Agriculture, which produces around a quarter of our carbon dioxide output, is exempt from the carbon tax. You’re not really serious about this whole “carbon pollution” deal, are you?
• Why don’t you just ban the mining, burning and export of coal? Your boss Bob Brown wants to. He thinks that coal caused the Queensland floods (or “water pollution").
• You’ve said that people shouldn’t be worried about media estimates of the amount they will be penalised. Why should they believe you?
• How does taking money off person A and giving it to person B help the climate?
• You’d be surprised, Ms Prime Minister, you really would, at the way clever lawyers can shift investments and capital around so that the source becomes “agriculture”.
• In 2007, Labor resources minister Martin Ferguson said that a mere $30 carbon tax on local flights would ”kill the Australian aviation industry both domestically and internationally.” If he was right, what does that mean for all Australian industries facing a carbon tax?
• What level of bureaucratic expansion will be required to deal with the intake and dispersal of something like $10 billion per year?
• Will your compensation plans take into account Australia’s regional differences in living standards? Because if they don’t, hard-up families in Sydney are going to be giving money to the well-off in Adelaide.
• What percentage of revenue from the carbon tax will be lost in bureaucratic churn between it being collected by your government and handed out in compensation?
• Instead of creating a tax system that eventually gives people their money back, why not just let them keep their own damn money in the first place?
• According to you, “there will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.” Would you mind telling us who does lead this government, then? Otherwise I’ve sent this to the wrong person.
Source
Dear Prime Minister Gillard,
Thank you for making the weather nicer by forcing us to pay more for everything. Who knew that fixing the global climate was so simple? Still, one or two questions remain about your new plan and a few related matters.
Yours in climate justice,
Tim
• By how much will your carbon dioxide tax reduce Australia’s temperature?
• If after five years there has been no recorded decline in temperature, will the tax be abandoned?
• Multiple choice! How much money has already been wasted by federal Australian governments on pointless climate change initiatives that have done nothing:
a - $2,000,000,000
b - $3,500,000,000
c - $5,500,000,000
• If taxing Australians at a certain level will make us more competitive with the rest of the world, as you claim, then surely taxing us at even higher levels will make us more competitive still. Universal taxation at, say, 80 per cent should make us a global powerhouse. Why are you holding Australia back?
• You claim that Australians want this new tax. How about testing your theory at an election?
• If I announced on television that I was going to kidnap the federal cabinet and put them through a series of deadly Saw-style torture tests, do you think I could avoid charges by asking the police to stop going on about “semantics” and “word games”?
• Do you have any experience in herding cats? This might be important during your coming 16 months of negotiations with the Greens, who you seem to have forgotten are completely insane.
• Considering Labor couldn’t run a simple grocery pricing website and Labor’s attempts to insulate houses ended up setting them on fire and killing people, what are the odds Labor can successfully run the country’s largest and most complicated tax regime?
• Labor promised to reduce the number of boat people arrivals. As with everything else, Labor’s policies resulted in exactly the opposite outcome. Now you’re trying to change the weather. Where should people hide?
• Carbon dioxide contains two oxygen atoms for every one carbon atom. Shouldn’t we call it an “oxygen tax”?
• If the aim of the carbon tax is to change behaviour, why are you planning to compensate so many households? They’ll just keep killing the planet and get no penalties at all.
• At what point does carbon dioxide’s necessary presence in the atmosphere become “pollution”?
• If the carbon tax is definitely going to be introduced on July 1, 2012, how come Tim Flannery is going to be paid $720,000 over the next four whole years while he roams the country “explaining” it?
• Isn’t explaining new taxes your job? Or, more specifically, Wayne Swan’s?
• For that matter, where was Wayne the other day when you announced this massive new tax? You were there, and so was Bob Brown and Christine Milne and Greg Combet and Tony Windsor and the Hairy Princess. But no Wayne.
• The next time you see Wayne, could you ask him why he said this last August: “What we rejected is this hysterical allegation that somehow we are moving towards a carbon tax.” This question should really be asked by journalists, I guess, but they’re too busy making excuses for your hilarious lies.
• What is the point of building a $27 billion national broadband network to deliver computer connectivity across the nation when Greg Combet is telling people to turn off lights and televisions?
• Another thing: how much more cost will be added to the NBN courtesy of the carbon tax?
• Agriculture, which produces around a quarter of our carbon dioxide output, is exempt from the carbon tax. You’re not really serious about this whole “carbon pollution” deal, are you?
• Why don’t you just ban the mining, burning and export of coal? Your boss Bob Brown wants to. He thinks that coal caused the Queensland floods (or “water pollution").
• You’ve said that people shouldn’t be worried about media estimates of the amount they will be penalised. Why should they believe you?
• How does taking money off person A and giving it to person B help the climate?
• You’d be surprised, Ms Prime Minister, you really would, at the way clever lawyers can shift investments and capital around so that the source becomes “agriculture”.
• In 2007, Labor resources minister Martin Ferguson said that a mere $30 carbon tax on local flights would ”kill the Australian aviation industry both domestically and internationally.” If he was right, what does that mean for all Australian industries facing a carbon tax?
• What level of bureaucratic expansion will be required to deal with the intake and dispersal of something like $10 billion per year?
• Will your compensation plans take into account Australia’s regional differences in living standards? Because if they don’t, hard-up families in Sydney are going to be giving money to the well-off in Adelaide.
• What percentage of revenue from the carbon tax will be lost in bureaucratic churn between it being collected by your government and handed out in compensation?
• Instead of creating a tax system that eventually gives people their money back, why not just let them keep their own damn money in the first place?
• According to you, “there will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.” Would you mind telling us who does lead this government, then? Otherwise I’ve sent this to the wrong person.
Source
Indigenous Australians cost taxpayers double what's spent on others, says report
It's amazing. Every time a government forms a committee to look into the "disadvantage" of the "disadvantaged", the disadvantaged are shown to be highly advantaged - yet they still can't look after themselves. The Australian Aborigines had more than $40 000 per person spent on them in the last financial year compared to non-indigenous (yet tax paying) Australians who came in at $18 351 per person. How do you like dem apples? Yet, we still need useless boards and committees and "human rights" groups - all sucking off the the tax payer sweet-teat - to look into their affairs to see if they are being disadvantaged! How about the Aborigines pull their finger and sort themselves out and the goody-two-shoes Australian government stop molly-coddling them and let them earn their own way - just like the evil non-indigenous people do? Let them also go to school, study and fend for themselves. Why must the same pattern be repeated generation after generation? We keep on paying when there is clearly NO benefit to either side - especially the Aborigines. They mostly lie around drinking, assaulting, fighting, sexually abusing their own people and children - that's what they do as a day job. Yet, the tax payer continues to fund their lifestyle. Someone is going to have to show some tough love and get rid of these blasted committees and boards and human rights dream-jobs and actually do something constructive. Just how much more money does Australia throw at a problem that is never going to go away in paid bribes and White guilt? No more welfare until kids behinds are sitting on school benches. And that's just the start....
A NEW report shows taxpayers spent more than $40,000 on every indigenous Australian in a year - more than twice that paid for every non-indigenous person.
The 2010 indigenous expenditure report released today shows that for the year 2008-2009 expenditure “related to” indigenous Australians totalled $21.9 billion, or 5.3 per cent of total general government expenditure.
While expenditure on non-indigenous Australians is estimated at $18,351 per person, expenditure on indigenous Australians per head of population is estimated at $40,228.
The report comes on the back of increasing violence and dysfunction in Alice Springs, with the former indigenous affairs minister in the Howard government, Mal Brough, telling The Weekend Australian the Northern Territory intervention wasn't working or creating lasting social change.
The new report reveals disproportionate funding for indigenous Australians as compared with non-indigenous Australians across a range of categories, and is likely to raise questions about the outcomes that are being achieved for indigenous peoples.
In terms of educational expenditure, $3.3 billion or 5.8 per cent of spending goes towards services related to indigenous Australians. This means, in terms of educational spending, an estimated $2.40 is spent per indigenous person for every one dollar spent per non-indigenous person.
Expenditure on indigenous health services was also estimated at $3.8 billion, or 4.8 per cent of government expenditure in that area. The per capita breakdown again reveals that for every dollar spent on health services for non-indigenous Australians, $1.95 is spent on indigenous Australians.
The cost of employment services for indigenous Australians was estimated to be $4.4 billion, representing about 4.3 per cent of government expenditure in that area.
In this category, the report estimates that for each indigenous person $8062 is spent on economic participation services as compared to $4578 per non-indigenous person.
And the discrepancy is replicated in expenditure on housing services, with the report finding that $4246 is spent for each indigenous Australian as compared to $1781 for non-indigenous Australians.
The report is the first of its kind and was agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments to assist policy makers in reducing disadvantage for indigenous Australians.
Source
A NEW report shows taxpayers spent more than $40,000 on every indigenous Australian in a year - more than twice that paid for every non-indigenous person.
The 2010 indigenous expenditure report released today shows that for the year 2008-2009 expenditure “related to” indigenous Australians totalled $21.9 billion, or 5.3 per cent of total general government expenditure.
While expenditure on non-indigenous Australians is estimated at $18,351 per person, expenditure on indigenous Australians per head of population is estimated at $40,228.
The report comes on the back of increasing violence and dysfunction in Alice Springs, with the former indigenous affairs minister in the Howard government, Mal Brough, telling The Weekend Australian the Northern Territory intervention wasn't working or creating lasting social change.
The new report reveals disproportionate funding for indigenous Australians as compared with non-indigenous Australians across a range of categories, and is likely to raise questions about the outcomes that are being achieved for indigenous peoples.
In terms of educational expenditure, $3.3 billion or 5.8 per cent of spending goes towards services related to indigenous Australians. This means, in terms of educational spending, an estimated $2.40 is spent per indigenous person for every one dollar spent per non-indigenous person.
Expenditure on indigenous health services was also estimated at $3.8 billion, or 4.8 per cent of government expenditure in that area. The per capita breakdown again reveals that for every dollar spent on health services for non-indigenous Australians, $1.95 is spent on indigenous Australians.
The cost of employment services for indigenous Australians was estimated to be $4.4 billion, representing about 4.3 per cent of government expenditure in that area.
In this category, the report estimates that for each indigenous person $8062 is spent on economic participation services as compared to $4578 per non-indigenous person.
And the discrepancy is replicated in expenditure on housing services, with the report finding that $4246 is spent for each indigenous Australian as compared to $1781 for non-indigenous Australians.
The report is the first of its kind and was agreed to by the Council of Australian Governments to assist policy makers in reducing disadvantage for indigenous Australians.
Source
Ferrari 612 Sessanta
 |
| Ferrari 612 Sessanta |
612 Sessanta is produced on the body of the 612 Scaglietti introduced during the Geneva Motor-Show 2007, and thus comes with the full enhancement package used for the latter.
It is available only with F1 gearbox and provides the following features.
Special contents:
Exterior coloursThe sixty cars shall be available alternatively in the following exterior colours:
• Two-colour special style:
o Grigio scuro (Colori Classici ’50-’60) / Nero with grigio scuro side line.
o Rubino Micalizzato / Nero Daytona with Rubino Micalizzato side line.
The following special colour features are added as well:
• Special colour of underbody black in technical black
• Colour treatment of the front headlight and rear bumper details in silver.
Exterior contents
• Electro-chromic panoramic roof panel with three transparency positions
• New monolithic and forged 19”/19” wheel rims
• Specific wheel cups
• Radiator grill with specific painted frame
• Chromium-plated rear grids with black chromed special exhaust pipes
• "612 Sessanta" emblem on front fender
 |
| Ferrari 612 Sessanta Interior |
Interiors are featured by a single-colour environment, with slightly contrasting stitching. Two choices are available.
• New Natural leather, "Terra Bruciata" coloured (exclusive colour on 612 Sessanta), including:
o Marrone carpets
o Interior details in Grigio Scuro (dash cross member, door panel details, tunnel plate)
o Black seat belts o Terra Bruciata colour for steering wheel, dashboard, rear shell, and upper interior part
Those interiors are exclusively available with Grigio Scuro / Nero livery.
New Natural leather Charcoal coloured, including:
o Grigio Scuro carpets o Interior details in Rubino Micalizzato (dash cross member, door panel details, tunnel plate)
o Grigio seat belts
o Charcoal colour for steering wheel, dashboard, rear shell, and upper interior part Those interiors are exclusively available with Rubino Micalizzato / Nero Daytona livery.
Interior content
• Steering wheel with three-position Manettino and Engine Start button • Exclusive upholstery style for seats, door panels and rear sides
• Specific central tunnel upholstered and fully equipped, with 2 cup-holding compartments and rear handles
• Four pockets on door panels, two of them closed
• Specially-styled instrument cluster
• Unique plate celebrating the 60-year anniversary on F1 gearbox plate
• Leather upholstered and equipped boot Further contents
• CCM braking system with black calipers
• Bose Media System
• Rear Parking Camera
• TV Tuner
• Cruise Control
Spesification:
Dimensions and Weight
Overall length 193.0 in
Overall width 77.0 in
Height 52.9 in
Wheelbase 116.1 in
Front track 66.5 in
Rear track 64.6 in
Dry weight 3880 lb*
Kerb weight 4134 lb*
Fuel tank capacity 24 UK gal (29 US gal)
Brakes
Front 15 x 1.34 in
Rear 14.2 x 1.26 in
Engine
Type 65° V12
Bore/stroke 3.50 x 3.03 in
Unit displacement 29.2 cu in
Total displacement 350.8 cu in
Compression ratio 11.2:1
Maximum power 397 kW (540 CV) at 7250 rpm
Maximum torque 588 Nm (434 lbft) at 5250 rpm
Gearbox
Gearbox F1A 6-gears+Reverse
Tyres
Front 245/40 ZR 19”
Rear 285/40 ZR 19”
Performance
Maximum speed 199 mph
0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) 4 s
Fuel Consumption
Combined 20.5 l/100 km
CO2 Emissions
Combined 470 g/km
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG CARS
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG
The Mercedes-Benz SL is a roadster manufactured by Mercedes since 1954. The designation SL derives from the German Sport Leicht, or Sport Light — and was first applied to the 300SL 'Gullwing' named also after its gullwing or upward-opening doors.The term SL-Class refers to the marketing variations of the vehicle, including the numerous engine configurations spanning five design generations.
Lamborghini Calá Cars
Lamborghini Calà, also known as the Italdesign Calà, was a concept car designed for Lamborghini by Italdesign Giugiaro. It was first shown at the 1995 Geneva Motor Show. It was a completely functional prototype that never made it into production.
The Calà was designed to fill Lamborghini's need for a replacement for the Jalpa, which discontinued production in 1988 at the behest of then owners of the company, Chrysler. In 1994 Chrysler sold Lamborghini to Megatech, the Calà design took shape, but when Megatech sold Lamborghini to the Volkswagen Group in 1998, the concept was shelved. The Jalpa replacement would not be found in Lamborghini's lineup until 2003, with the release of the Lamborghini Gallardo.
The Calà was powered by a mid-mounted V10 engine, which produced 400 hp (300 kW), mated to a 6-speed transmission that drove the rear wheels. Top speed was estimated at 181 mph (291 km/h).
The car is featured in the 1997 computer and video game Need for Speed II and Need for Speed II SE.
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini Calá Showroom
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini Calá Video
The Calà was designed to fill Lamborghini's need for a replacement for the Jalpa, which discontinued production in 1988 at the behest of then owners of the company, Chrysler. In 1994 Chrysler sold Lamborghini to Megatech, the Calà design took shape, but when Megatech sold Lamborghini to the Volkswagen Group in 1998, the concept was shelved. The Jalpa replacement would not be found in Lamborghini's lineup until 2003, with the release of the Lamborghini Gallardo.
The Calà was powered by a mid-mounted V10 engine, which produced 400 hp (300 kW), mated to a 6-speed transmission that drove the rear wheels. Top speed was estimated at 181 mph (291 km/h).
The car is featured in the 1997 computer and video game Need for Speed II and Need for Speed II SE.
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini Calá Showroom
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini Calá
Lamborghini CaláLamborghini Calá Video
Rendered 2012 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG
Rendered 2012 Mercedes-Benz.This is a matter of time before the Mercedes-Benz AMG version escape of his rival for new C-Class coupe two-door BMW M3, but cars drive Coop Luis Silva of Portugal has decided to a rapid chopping of the C63 AMG Coupe for our Viewing pleasure.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
UK: Unruly youngsters must be sent to boot camps to learn respect, declares Gove
I say just send them to the good old Catholic schools of years gone by. My first few school years were spent at a school run by Nuns. Boy did we learn the meaning of discipline quickly. No touchy-feely love for us - no, it was a wooden clothes brush for the girls hands and a canning by the Principle (Nun) for the boys. I can assure you that you only ever sinned once and then never again. Backchatting? What was that! Fighting? Never! Yup, the good old days. Spare the rod, spare the child. Going to public school meant long detentions for the girls and boys or canning for the boys that transgressed a little too often. Nowadays kids get "suspended" from school for the day and then they wonder why kids are acting up! I too would have acted up if it meant not going to school! In any case, the UK want to introduce ex-military personnel to act as mentors to troubled teens. Good luck with that! Maybe they should allow parents to discipline their kids again - just saying...
Youngsters need the rigour of a military-style education because they have ‘no self-discipline or sense of purpose’, the Education Secretary said.
Michael Gove attacked the declining virtues of the young yesterday, as he announced £1.5million funding to draft battle-hardened troops into ‘boot camps’ for unruly pupils.
He believes war veterans are needed to drill respect into troubled teenagers and provide them with role models.
Under the plans, to be unveiled today, 100 soldiers, sailors and air crew will be retrained as mentors for pupils excluded from school or on the brink of exclusion.
They will instill traditional values through physical drills, assault courses and practical lessons taught outdoors.
The grant, to charity SkillForce, will help some 400 pupils in its first year, and finance three projects based in Liverpool and Hull.
Mr Gove said: ‘There is a huge opportunity for those people who have served their country in uniform to serve their country in our schools. They have many of the virtues that parents feel have disappeared from our schools and need to be restored: self-discipline, a sense of purpose and a belief in the importance of working as a team.’
Dr Liam Fox, Secretary of State for Defence, welcomed the move: ‘The nation’s children will thrive under the mentorship of these courageous individuals.’
The scheme is the first of a series of measures to place ex-servicemen and women in the classroom to improve discipline.
Former officers – educated to degree level – will be fast-tracked as teachers in a scheme to be announced this spring. There are 16,000 children outside schooling.
Many have been excluded due to bad behaviour.
Source
Youngsters need the rigour of a military-style education because they have ‘no self-discipline or sense of purpose’, the Education Secretary said.
Michael Gove attacked the declining virtues of the young yesterday, as he announced £1.5million funding to draft battle-hardened troops into ‘boot camps’ for unruly pupils.
He believes war veterans are needed to drill respect into troubled teenagers and provide them with role models.
Under the plans, to be unveiled today, 100 soldiers, sailors and air crew will be retrained as mentors for pupils excluded from school or on the brink of exclusion.
They will instill traditional values through physical drills, assault courses and practical lessons taught outdoors.
The grant, to charity SkillForce, will help some 400 pupils in its first year, and finance three projects based in Liverpool and Hull.
Mr Gove said: ‘There is a huge opportunity for those people who have served their country in uniform to serve their country in our schools. They have many of the virtues that parents feel have disappeared from our schools and need to be restored: self-discipline, a sense of purpose and a belief in the importance of working as a team.’
Dr Liam Fox, Secretary of State for Defence, welcomed the move: ‘The nation’s children will thrive under the mentorship of these courageous individuals.’
The scheme is the first of a series of measures to place ex-servicemen and women in the classroom to improve discipline.
Former officers – educated to degree level – will be fast-tracked as teachers in a scheme to be announced this spring. There are 16,000 children outside schooling.
Many have been excluded due to bad behaviour.
Source
Fort Worth elementary teacher accused of assaulting elderly couple in Arlington mall
Yup - this is what US teachers teach their kids - how to beat up old folk for a chair! Can you imagine a group of Primary/Elementary school kids going on a field trip with their teacher and then later watching as that same teacher bashes, chokes and spits on old folk in their 70's? I guess that must be the norm where Ms Stafford comes from. Good, moral people chosen to teach the youth....I have seen enough US realityTV to know how these Black women fight and how foul they are and it's no surprise that reality TV equals reality life. Black women seem to have a huge angry chip on their shoulder and the anti-White hatred permeates off them. If anything, Bette and her husband showed guts to stand up to this bully teacher - a teacher with a history of aggravated assault (weapon and bodily injury). How on earth was she cleared to be a teacher???
A Fort Worth elementary school teacher faces a felony charge of injury to the elderly over allegations that she assaulted a couple in their 70s at an Arlington mall Saturday during a school field trip.
Brenda Jones Stafford, a fifth-grade teacher at A.M. Pate Elementary School, is accused of choking and pushing a 71-year-old woman in an argument over a chair in The Parks mall's food court, then shoving, hitting and choking the woman's 73-year-old husband when he tried to intervene.
Stafford, 47, was arrested in another area of the mall about 4 p.m. shortly after the altercation. She was booked into the Arlington Jail on suspicion of injury to the elderly, a state jail felony, and offensive/provocative contact, a Class C misdemeanor, and released that same day after posting bond.
Barbara Griffith, a Fort Worth school district spokeswoman, confirmed Wednesday that the incident occurred while the teacher was accompanying A.M. Pate students on a field trip. She said Stafford was placed on administrative leave Monday pending the outcome of the investigation.
"She self-reported right away, and she was immediately put on administrative leave," Griffith said.
Stafford declined to comment.
Bette Davis Morgan and her husband, Carlton, were drinking coffee and chatting in the food court when Stafford, while apparently gathering chairs for her group, pushed a chair on which Bette Morgan was resting her leg, commenting "Listen, lady, I don't need your chair with your leg on it," according to Morgan.
Morgan said she removed her leg from the chair and continued her conversation with her husband.
But she said Stafford deliberately shoved the chair against their table, striking Morgan's knee. Morgan said she told the woman not to shove the chair because it was hitting her knee under the table.
She said Stafford deliberately did it again twice.
"Every time she came by, she'd shove that chair under the table toward my knee, hard," said Morgan, who said she had injured the same knee in a wreck while in her teens.
After the third time, Morgan said, she got up and confronted Stafford.
"She made some kind of snotty remark to me, saying, 'Don't you tell me what to do, woman,'" Morgan said. "Then she got up in my face and started shaking her finger in my face and started blowing in my face."
Morgan blew back into the woman's face, she said, and the woman spat on her.
Morgan said that she spat to the side of Stafford and that the woman lunged at her, choked her and pushed her down.
Morgan said her husband was trying to intervene when Stafford shoved him down and began hitting and choking him.
"That's when her people started yelling at her to get off of him, that she was acting like a madwoman, and pulled her off my husband," Morgan said.
Tiara Richard, an Arlington police spokeswoman, said that officers arrested Stafford in another area of the mall and that neither of the Morgans required medical treatment.
Morgan said Wednesday that bruises have surfaced on her body and that she plans to see a doctor Friday to be checked out.
"It was a shock, and it was very, very upsetting," Morgan said.
Tarrant County court records show that in 1995 Stafford was previously charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assault with bodily injury, stemming from allegations that she threatened injury to a woman while using or exhibiting a firearm. Prosecutors later dismissed both charges.
Court records indicated that she had passed a polygraph in the case.
Source
Carlton and Bette Davis Morgan (left) and Carlton Brenda Jones Stafford (right)
A Fort Worth elementary school teacher faces a felony charge of injury to the elderly over allegations that she assaulted a couple in their 70s at an Arlington mall Saturday during a school field trip.
Brenda Jones Stafford, a fifth-grade teacher at A.M. Pate Elementary School, is accused of choking and pushing a 71-year-old woman in an argument over a chair in The Parks mall's food court, then shoving, hitting and choking the woman's 73-year-old husband when he tried to intervene.
Stafford, 47, was arrested in another area of the mall about 4 p.m. shortly after the altercation. She was booked into the Arlington Jail on suspicion of injury to the elderly, a state jail felony, and offensive/provocative contact, a Class C misdemeanor, and released that same day after posting bond.
Barbara Griffith, a Fort Worth school district spokeswoman, confirmed Wednesday that the incident occurred while the teacher was accompanying A.M. Pate students on a field trip. She said Stafford was placed on administrative leave Monday pending the outcome of the investigation.
"She self-reported right away, and she was immediately put on administrative leave," Griffith said.
Stafford declined to comment.
Bette Davis Morgan and her husband, Carlton, were drinking coffee and chatting in the food court when Stafford, while apparently gathering chairs for her group, pushed a chair on which Bette Morgan was resting her leg, commenting "Listen, lady, I don't need your chair with your leg on it," according to Morgan.
Morgan said she removed her leg from the chair and continued her conversation with her husband.
But she said Stafford deliberately shoved the chair against their table, striking Morgan's knee. Morgan said she told the woman not to shove the chair because it was hitting her knee under the table.
She said Stafford deliberately did it again twice.
"Every time she came by, she'd shove that chair under the table toward my knee, hard," said Morgan, who said she had injured the same knee in a wreck while in her teens.
After the third time, Morgan said, she got up and confronted Stafford.
"She made some kind of snotty remark to me, saying, 'Don't you tell me what to do, woman,'" Morgan said. "Then she got up in my face and started shaking her finger in my face and started blowing in my face."
Morgan blew back into the woman's face, she said, and the woman spat on her.
Morgan said that she spat to the side of Stafford and that the woman lunged at her, choked her and pushed her down.
Morgan said her husband was trying to intervene when Stafford shoved him down and began hitting and choking him.
"That's when her people started yelling at her to get off of him, that she was acting like a madwoman, and pulled her off my husband," Morgan said.
Tiara Richard, an Arlington police spokeswoman, said that officers arrested Stafford in another area of the mall and that neither of the Morgans required medical treatment.
Morgan said Wednesday that bruises have surfaced on her body and that she plans to see a doctor Friday to be checked out.
"It was a shock, and it was very, very upsetting," Morgan said.
Tarrant County court records show that in 1995 Stafford was previously charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assault with bodily injury, stemming from allegations that she threatened injury to a woman while using or exhibiting a firearm. Prosecutors later dismissed both charges.
Court records indicated that she had passed a polygraph in the case.
Source
More Than 60 Arrested in Nationwide Mexican Drug Gang Sweep
This is truly disgusting. It takes the death of a U.S agent in Mexico to stun the Federal, state and local authorities into actually doing their job? As Mr Pike says:" the sweeps are a direct response to Zapata's killing, the majority of suspects were already targets of other investigations". So, in other words: "we were going easy on all these illegal activities, but then some USA guy died and now we have to really do our jobs for a change"....So, I guess they're finally admitting that you have to fight fire with fire and not a PC white flag. Thousands of people have died in Mexico so that the drug lords can traffic their goods into the USA to supply the local market. Cut off the suppliers and there will be no market. If I were the family of Mr Zapata, I would sue the Federal government's socks off. They have admitted to ignoring crime which was happening right under their noses...
WASHINGTON -- Federal, state and local authorities conducted a massive sweep Thursday of suspected Mexican drug cartel members in the United States in a widespread domestic response to the killing of a U.S. agent in Mexico last week.
"We are taking a stand and we are sending a message back to the cartels that we will not tolerate the murder of a U.S. agent, or any U.S. official," said Carl Pike, assistant special agent in charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration's special operations division.
Pike said the nationwide roundup, which began Wednesday and was expected to continue into Friday, is targeting suspected criminals with ties to any Mexican drug cartel to try to disrupt drug trafficking operations in the United States.
By Thursday morning, agents in areas including Atlanta, St. Louis, Denver, Detroit, San Antonio, San Diego, Chicago and New Jersey had seized more than $4.5 million in cash and nearly 20 guns, arrested more than 100 people and confiscated about 23 pounds of methamphetamine, 107 kilos of cocaine, 5 pounds of heroin and 300 pounds of marijuana at more than 150 different locations.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata was killed, and fellow ICE agent Victor Avila was wounded in Mexico on Feb. 15 when the Chevy Suburban they were in was run off the road by at least two vehicles loaded with armed men. Authorities have said the agents, who were driving in a fortified sport utility vehicle with diplomatic license plates, identified themselves as U.S. diplomats in the moments before the shooting.
Pike said that while the sweeps are a direct response to Zapata's killing, the majority of suspects were already targets of other investigations.
"People actually sacrificed a great deal of work" for these sweeps, Pike said. "For the lost agent's memory it's important, but we're also in a bully situation. If we don't push back, some other 18-year-old cartel member is going to think, 'They didn't do anything, so all U.S. citizens are fair game."'
Mexican law enforcement and politicians have become routine targets of Mexico's warring drug cartels. But for the most part, U.S. authorities had largely been avoided.
Read more here
WASHINGTON -- Federal, state and local authorities conducted a massive sweep Thursday of suspected Mexican drug cartel members in the United States in a widespread domestic response to the killing of a U.S. agent in Mexico last week.
"We are taking a stand and we are sending a message back to the cartels that we will not tolerate the murder of a U.S. agent, or any U.S. official," said Carl Pike, assistant special agent in charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration's special operations division.
Pike said the nationwide roundup, which began Wednesday and was expected to continue into Friday, is targeting suspected criminals with ties to any Mexican drug cartel to try to disrupt drug trafficking operations in the United States.
By Thursday morning, agents in areas including Atlanta, St. Louis, Denver, Detroit, San Antonio, San Diego, Chicago and New Jersey had seized more than $4.5 million in cash and nearly 20 guns, arrested more than 100 people and confiscated about 23 pounds of methamphetamine, 107 kilos of cocaine, 5 pounds of heroin and 300 pounds of marijuana at more than 150 different locations.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata was killed, and fellow ICE agent Victor Avila was wounded in Mexico on Feb. 15 when the Chevy Suburban they were in was run off the road by at least two vehicles loaded with armed men. Authorities have said the agents, who were driving in a fortified sport utility vehicle with diplomatic license plates, identified themselves as U.S. diplomats in the moments before the shooting.
Pike said that while the sweeps are a direct response to Zapata's killing, the majority of suspects were already targets of other investigations.
"People actually sacrificed a great deal of work" for these sweeps, Pike said. "For the lost agent's memory it's important, but we're also in a bully situation. If we don't push back, some other 18-year-old cartel member is going to think, 'They didn't do anything, so all U.S. citizens are fair game."'
Mexican law enforcement and politicians have become routine targets of Mexico's warring drug cartels. But for the most part, U.S. authorities had largely been avoided.
Read more here
Italy Warns of a New Wave of Immigrants to Europe
One of the fall-outs of the recent anti-government uprisings in North Africa is the coming refugee issue. People from Tunisia, Libya and Egypt (and other Arab countries) are going to use the riots as their meal ticket into Europe. 5000 Tunisians have already turned up on Italy's doorstep with their begging bowl out. Italy is concerned and Monika Lüke, head of Amnesty International in Germany, has called on Germany to "act". I wonder what she wants Germany to do? Couldn't possibly want the country to take in upward of the estimated 300 000 "refugees" could she? I wonder how many will be moving in next door to her?? Anyhoo, France and Germany will be feeling the love as these mainly Muslim immigrants flee to greener pastures where the Europeans will get to support them with their hard-earned tax money. Yes, that's the way to go - screw up your own Arab countries and then run to where the Westerners live in Christian peace. Good luck Europe.
Moammar Gadhafi, in recent years, has enjoyed a cynical role as Europe's border guard against African immigrants. Italian ministers now warn that if his Libyan government collapses, people will flow across the Mediterranean.
Chaos in Libya has led to immediate concern that hundreds of thousands of immigrants could head for Europe. Italy's interior minister, ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, called on Thursday for European help in dealing with a looming "catastrophic humanitarian emergency."
A 'Biblical Exodus'
"We know what to expect when the Libyan national system falls," said Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini on Wednesday, according to the UK Telegraph. "A wave of 200,000 to 300,000 immigrants."
"These are estimates, and on the low side," he added. "It is a Biblical exodus. It's a problem that no Italian should underestimate."
Over 5,000 migrants have already sailed from Tunisia to the Italian island of Lampedusa since the Tunisian government fell in January. But post-uprising conditions in Tunisia are mild compared to reports this week from Libya, where Gadhafi's security forces have fired on protesters as well as on guest workers who have now started to flee across the borders into Egypt and Tunisia.
Gadhafi, Guarding the Gates
Gadhafi in recent years has played up his role as a bulwark against African immigrants to Europe. Italy and Libya began joint naval patrols in 2008 to stop boatloads of illegal or trafficked immigrants from crossing the Mediterranean, and last year Libya signed a €50 billion deal with the European Union to manage its borders as a "transit country" for sub-Saharan Africans.
Italian Foreign Minister Frattini said that some 2.5 million people in Libya -- about a third of the population -- are non-Libyan immigrants who would flee if the government fell.
Gadhafi himself has enjoyed stoking these fears. "Europe will become black," he said last December, if European leaders failed to cooperate with him on immigration controls.
Welcome to Germany?
Amnesty International is calling on other countries to ease the burden on Italy if institutions there are overwhelmed. "Germany, as the largest and most economically powerful country in Europe, has a special responsibility to act," said Monika Lüke, head of Amnesty International in Germany. "Germany has to finally end its obstructionist attitude regarding a common refugee policy in the EU."
Ironically the head of Italy's anti-immigrant Northern League party, Umberto Bossi, made similar statements. "If they come, we will just send them to France and Germany," he said according to the Telegraph.
But German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, on his way to the EU summit in Brussels, which begins on Thursday, warned Thursday morning that rumors of a refugee crisis could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Europe, he told the German broadcaster ZDF, should try to promote stability in North Africa. "People stay in countries with stable democracies," he said.
Source
 |
| Coming soon to an EU country near you! |
Chaos in Libya has led to immediate concern that hundreds of thousands of immigrants could head for Europe. Italy's interior minister, ahead of an EU summit in Brussels, called on Thursday for European help in dealing with a looming "catastrophic humanitarian emergency."
A 'Biblical Exodus'
"We know what to expect when the Libyan national system falls," said Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini on Wednesday, according to the UK Telegraph. "A wave of 200,000 to 300,000 immigrants."
"These are estimates, and on the low side," he added. "It is a Biblical exodus. It's a problem that no Italian should underestimate."
Over 5,000 migrants have already sailed from Tunisia to the Italian island of Lampedusa since the Tunisian government fell in January. But post-uprising conditions in Tunisia are mild compared to reports this week from Libya, where Gadhafi's security forces have fired on protesters as well as on guest workers who have now started to flee across the borders into Egypt and Tunisia.
Gadhafi, Guarding the Gates
Gadhafi in recent years has played up his role as a bulwark against African immigrants to Europe. Italy and Libya began joint naval patrols in 2008 to stop boatloads of illegal or trafficked immigrants from crossing the Mediterranean, and last year Libya signed a €50 billion deal with the European Union to manage its borders as a "transit country" for sub-Saharan Africans.
Italian Foreign Minister Frattini said that some 2.5 million people in Libya -- about a third of the population -- are non-Libyan immigrants who would flee if the government fell.
Gadhafi himself has enjoyed stoking these fears. "Europe will become black," he said last December, if European leaders failed to cooperate with him on immigration controls.
Welcome to Germany?
Amnesty International is calling on other countries to ease the burden on Italy if institutions there are overwhelmed. "Germany, as the largest and most economically powerful country in Europe, has a special responsibility to act," said Monika Lüke, head of Amnesty International in Germany. "Germany has to finally end its obstructionist attitude regarding a common refugee policy in the EU."
Ironically the head of Italy's anti-immigrant Northern League party, Umberto Bossi, made similar statements. "If they come, we will just send them to France and Germany," he said according to the Telegraph.
But German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, on his way to the EU summit in Brussels, which begins on Thursday, warned Thursday morning that rumors of a refugee crisis could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Europe, he told the German broadcaster ZDF, should try to promote stability in North Africa. "People stay in countries with stable democracies," he said.
Source
Texas demographer: 'It's basically over for Anglos'
Good news Texas - in case you've been wondering why there doesn't seem to be as many Anglos in the state as there were a few years back, they've finally worked out why! Get this - the Hispanics and other minorities are out-breeding the local Anglos! No!! I would never have guessed! A demographer has rung the warning bells on the Anglo demise in the state. The future looks bleak assuming the current trend line does not change because education and income levels for Hispanics lag considerably behind Anglos. If current trends continue, then by 2040 only 20% of the state's public school enrollment will be Anglo - which means only 30% of the state's labor force will not have a high school diploma as per the current Hispanic stats. Oh dear - I can see the writing on the wall as the Anglos flee to more "Anglo" states - maybe those that are currently cutting down on the illegals? This is the outcome of generous welfare/social/health programs. The educated have to pay for these programs on behalf of the lower income and non-earners - which tend mainly to be the minorities. The minorities generally breed all day long and don't have to pay for their kids upbringing - so they pop them out with impunity. The Anglos stop having children cause they can't afford them and/or nowadays it's also way cool not to have any as they may interfere with their new boob job, car, house or boat they want to buy right now! As is fashionable these days, they wait until they're 40 and then adopt an "other" to feel good about themselves. Maybe it's a blessing in disguise because who the heck wants them to pass on their liberal DNA anyway??
Two of every three Texas children are now non-Anglo and the trend line will become even more pronounced in the future, said Murdock, former U.S. Census Bureau director and now director of the Hobby Center for the Study of Texas at Rice University.
Today's Texas population can be divided into two groups, he said. One is an old and aging Anglo and the other is young and minority. Between 2000 and 2040, the state's public school enrollment will see a 15 percent decline in Anglo children while Hispanic children will make up a 213 percent increase, he said.
The state's largest county - Harris - will shed Anglos throughout the coming decades. By 2040, Harris County will have about 516, 000 fewer Anglos than lived in the Houston area in 2000, while the number of Hispanics will increase by 2.5 million during the same period, Murdock said. The projection assumes a net migration rate equal to one-half of 1990-2000.
Most of the state's population growth is natural, Murdock told the House Mexican American Legislative Caucus today. About 22 percent of the growth comes from people moving to Texas from other states.
About 6 percent of the state's population is not documented, he said.
By 2040, only 20 percent of the state's public school enrollment will be Anglo, he said. Last year, non-Hispanic white children made up 33.3 percent of the state's 4.8 million public school enrollment.
Of the state's 254 counties, 79 recorded declining population during the past 20 years. All are rural. An additional 30 Texas counties, he said, would have also lost population had they not experienced Hispanic growth.
The state's future looks bleak assuming the current trend line does not change because education and income levels for Hispanics lag considerably behind Anglos, he said.
Unless the trend line changes, 30 percent of the state's labor force will not have even a high school diploma by 2040, he said. And the average household income will be about $6,500 lower than it was in 2000. That figure is not inflation adjusted so it will be worse than what it sounds.
"It's a terrible situation that you are in. I am worried," Murdock said.
Source
Bugaty Veyron 16.4 Review
Stock 2006 Bugatti Veyron 16.4
Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Grand
The new" Bugatti Veyron 16.4
The 2006 Bugatti Veyron 16.4
View more Bugatti Veyron
Bugatti EB 16.4 Veyron Pur
2006 Bugatti Veyron 16.4 -
Chevrolet Camaro Bumblebee Collection Pics
Chevrolet Camaro Bumblebee
Chevrolet Camaro Bumblebee
Chevrolet Camaro Bumblebee
2010 Chevrolet Camaro:
Chevrolet Camaro Bumblebee
2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8: the momentum continues
2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8: the momentum continues, with a dose of performance and 6.1-liter SRT HEMI ® Power
Ultimate American Performance Sedan
Based on the pace of Chrysler, HEMI, and Street and Racing Technology
SRT performance: 0-60 mph in low range of five seconds, 0-100-0 in the range of mid-16-seconds
2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8
September 1, 2005, in Auburn Hills, Michigan -
It was not long after the beginning of the C300 Chrysler HEMI ® power in 1955 that became known as "banker's hot rod." The main features of this car a powerful V-8 HEMI engine mount tuned performance and handling and high quality services are also key to the 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8. And there is a little more.
Introduced in 2005, the Chrysler 300C SRT8 is the first street and motor Racing Technology (SRT) of the vehicle with the 6.1-liter HEMI V-8, which offers 85 more horsepower - the power to 25 percent - to 5.7-liter HEMI. But SRT performance is more than the straight-line speed.
"No other luxury sedan that offers comfort, convenience and efficiency that the 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8 delivers," said Jeff Bell, Vice President of Marketing, Chrysler, Chrysler Group. "In terms of availability, no one else comes close to providing the Chrysler 300C SRT8's combination of performance and value."
"2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8 is a complete package for the customer who wants awesome performance in an award-winning sedan loaded comfort and style," said Dan Knott, Director - Street and Racing Technology. "With the HEMI SRT-engineering of 6 , 1 liter and Brembo brakes, it is designed for incredible acceleration and braking. "
For 2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8 is available in new color silver steel exterior. Also new for 2006 is a system for monitoring tire pressure standard, an available Kicker ® high performance audio system and video system available rear seat.
Powertrain
The Chrysler 300C SRT8 425 horsepower (317 kW), normally aspirated 6.1-liter HEMI has the highest output for its size of any naturally aspirated V-8 engine ever offered by the Chrysler Group. Its nominal 69.8 per liter exceeds even that of legendary 1966 "Street HEMI." Torque is rated 420 lb-ft (569 N • m).
2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8
Although the Chrysler HEMI was born in 1950 and entered into legend in the 1960s and 70s, the current version took much of his inspiration from the original, particularly the namesake hemispherical combustion chamber, which provides power and effectiveness.
When the SRT engineers propulsion system is proposed to develop a more powerful HEMI for the Chrysler 300C SRT8, they were aware of the heritage of the motor, which led to adopting traditional HEMI engine indexes, including a block of orange paint, cylinder and valve covers black.
SRT engineers developed the Chrysler 300C SRT8 engine achieved more horsepower by adding cubic inches, increasing the compression ratio and redesigning the cylinder head, intake and exhaust system to regulate and increase the speed of the engine.
For more displacement, SRT engineers bored cylinders of the HEMI diameter of 3.5 millimeters each in order to increase the displacement to 6.1 liters from 5.7 liters.
The compression ratio was increased to 10.3:1 from 9.6:1, increasing engine power and strength.
Engine breathing was increased with new high-flow head cylinder, specially designed intake manifold and exhaust manifolds with individual tubes encased in a stainless steel shell, all unique in the 6.1-liter HEMI engine. Larger diameter valves and reshaped ports in the head allows the air flow optimized. The intake manifold was designed with larger diameter runners and less for the high speed setting. Exhaust system is routed to a large diameter (2.75 inches vs. 2.5 inches) exhaust with chrome tips of 3.5 inches.
To further increase the power of the camshaft profiles on the basis of performance have been developed to allow more air in and out of the cylinders and run a higher rpm. SRT engineers increased HEMI's peak speed of the engine power by almost 20 percent to 6,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) from 5000 rpm. Intake and exhaust valve stems are hollow, and exhaust valve stems are filled with sodium to help dissipate heat more effectively.
The high-performance SRT 6.1-liter HEMI is strengthened with redesigned components, including a reinforced engine block, a forged steel crankshaft, powdered metal bars of high resistance connection, floating-pin pistons (cooled guns oil), modified oil and a cover to handle the return of the oil pan sump at high speed.
Power for the SRT 6.1-liter HEMI is channeled through a five-speed automatic transmission specially calibrated driver-selectable Auto Stick ®, which offers fully automatic or manual selection. A heavy four pin clamp transmits torque transmission to improve differential and axles.
2006 CHRYSLER 300 USED CAR FOR SALE
2006 CHRYSLER 300 USED CAR FOR SALE
my 2006 300 Touring has been great and horrible at the same time. unfortunately the horrible is starting to out weigh the good. I bought it for it looks and power. At purchase time, 79,000 miles, it was a friends corp fleet vehicle.You can't deny it is one of the coolest looking cars on the road today. The V6 power is great, but the transmission is a pain, shifting is horrible (automatic). ESP works very well, sort of clunky in its responsiveness. Mechanical issues: front end rattling that nobody can seem to fix or id, broken tie rod, brakes:caliper malf replacd evry 20k. worst of all electrical: entire heat/air controls work sporatically, and headlights flicker off at worst time.
Car Features
Rear-Wheel Drive, Engine: 6.1L V8 16V MPFI OHV, Cylinder: 8, 4 Door Sedan, Doors: 4, Fuel Consumption: City: 14, Fuel Consumption: Highway: 20, Memorized Settings including audio, Memorized Settings including door mirror(s),
2005 CHRYSLER 300 FAN
2005 CHRYSLER 300 FAN ,Have you ever thought of spending the Chrysler 300C? Here are some thoughts to think.
Many people believe it is better to give than to receive. When you donate a car service card donation, you may be able to give and receive. When you decide to sell your car through a car donation service of good reputation, it will not use their money for advertising. Your donation will be great to help many people, and contribute to problems in many parts of the world.
So what exactly will your donation support? The possibilities are endless. You may be helping the medical community to find cures for cancer, feeding the hungry, give back to families that provide children with food, clothing and education, etc. There are really no limits to what causes you can contribute.2005 CHRYSLER 300 FAN
car donation is often done for many reasons. No matter why you give your car it is completely tax deductible. Just give a car donation service a call. They search the car at no cost to you almost anywhere in the United States. At that time, you get all the documents you need to claim your very generous donation of your tax return.
The car can become almost anything when it comes to donations. You can go to help children in need, as far as clothes, food, school supplies, housing and more. You can go in September, as the treatment of cancer, AIDS and hunger in the world. Donate food, clothes and all that we can always benefit. The car can go towards a number of types of support. That money is used or the machine will have a lasting impact on any cause and the charity has the privilege of receiving it is.
Car donations can help here in the U.S. causes and abroad. A car can do much in that goes a long way to help spread and goods. You also have control of their vehicle donation. You can be a cause or charity in mind, or just want to know what your vehicle donation for those who do not participate. When choosing a company to donate online, you can choose a company that will give exactly the cause or charity of your choice, or at least you'll know exactly what your donation will help.
Many people want to know that their contribution really makes a difference. Donations need to make a lasting impression. When you donate a car, you must give a gift that is very positive in a sustainable way. Imagine the happiness you give to others. You can also find happiness and contentment within yourself to make a difference in the lives of people in need. The world will be a better place because you made a wonderful contribution. Car donation is on what the impact of the number of vehicle donations are needed. More cars that receive a larger charitable gift donated and supported.
2005 CHRYSLER 300 FAN
The American Relief Foundation invites you to help give poor children across America with the support they need. If you have lost your car title, and can not donate, we have an excellent resource to connect you straight to the DMV to order a copy of car title. We are looking for a car donation to Wyoming to help our cause. If you have a junk car and explore options to donate your car.
Lamborghini Gallardo LP 570 Superleggera Pics
2011 Lamborghini Gallardo
Lamborghini Gallardo LP570-4
2011 Lamborghini Gallardo
Gallardo LP570-4
Gallardo LP570-4
Lamborghini Gallardo Interior Pics
2009 Lamborghini Gallardo
lamborghini-gallardo-interior-
Lamborghini Gallardo
2004 Lamborghini Gallardo
Interior
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
